Letter: The true value of scientific research

Mr Patrick J. Gaffney
Friday 28 May 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I read with interest the article by Tom Wilkie and colleagues ('Wanted: a boost for British research', 24 May) and the accompanying leading article dealing with the impending publication of a White Paper on the future of science and technology in Britain.

Whereas you highlighted the poor record of our government in supporting research, I feel the crucial cause for our decline as a leader in scientific research was missed. It is simply that there is no career structure for young scientists in this country. Many young PhDs begin their three-year temporary contracts at salaries between pounds 14,000 and pounds 16,000 per annum (after six to eight years' intensive university training), often with no guarantee of permanence, regardless of performance.

As a consequence, the A-level requirement for entry to read science subjects in university has dropped dramatically in the last 20 years; our young people realise that well-paid jobs, on track to lucrative elevated administrative positions, are more probable after reading general studies, economics, law, etc.

To blame, as is common practice, science teachers in our secondary schools for poor enrolment into science is a gross misrepresentation of the situation. Senior academics, who head our royal societies and other academic groupings and who might influence this downward trend, seem unfortunately to have been neutralised by the expectation of honours if they do not 'rock the boat'.

The Government must realise that research is about intelligent people pursuing the quest for knowledge over a wide range of areas, and that these people need to be supported with realistic career opportunities. Until this happens, front-line research in Britain will continue to decline. Novel industrial development is inherently linked with scientific breakthroughs; thus the economic prospect in this country looks quite bleak, unless the Government addresses the problem of career opportunities in science with great urgency.

Yours faithfully,

PATRICK J. GAFFNEY

Harpenden, Hertfordshire

27 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in