LETTER: The true cost of lorry travel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is a pity that Geoff Dossetter, of the Freight Transport Association, skated so lightly over the cost to the country of lorry travel (Letters, 6 April).
His statement, "lorries pay taxes well in excess of their road-wear costs", hides more than it reveals. In fact, as recent work by David Pearce has shown, the true costs of lorry travel are very high. If the pollution, congestion, noise and deaths and serious injuries caused by heavy lorries are given a monetary value, they come nowhere near to paying their way.
Indeed, another study, A New Framework for Freight Transport, published by the Civic Trust, found that if heavy lorries were to pay their way, there would be such a substantial switch of freight to the railways that they would be able to run their freight trains, at profit, without receiving any subsidy from the Government. That is the environmentally-friendly and economically-sensible way forward.
John Stewart
Chair, Alarm UK
London E3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments