LETTER: The shape of Paternoster Square

John Pearce
Tuesday 16 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr John Pearce

Sir: When I was a boy I had a set of building bricks. Imaginatively designed, it had pieces in every "classical" shape one could wish for - low pediments, steep pediments, quarter-arcs, arches, tympana, columns, capitals, architraves, even finials (I remember learning the names from the instruction sheet, and thinking, even at the age of seven, how artificial it all seemed). The set was rather short of plain blocks and bricks, it is true, but I was to see it in use once more after 50 years - in the drawings for the Paternoster Square scheme.

The central defect of both the 1950s scheme and the current proposals is very simple: they are both unrelieved office space. The area needs a brief that includes a substantial proportion of residential space distributed in units of a wide range of sizes and across as much of the price range as the economics of the whole project will allow. Given those requirements, the "classical" Post-Modernists would be unable to make the area look better than a des. det. res. estate in Wimbledon and would be laughed out of court.

Yours etc,

John Pearce

Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire

10 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in