Letter: The Russian threat - and how to contain it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In principle, Jonathan Eyal is right to suggest that Nato should be extended eastwards to include the non-Soviet states of the former Warsaw Pact.
Unfortunately, though, in its present form his proposal would leave the non-Russian republics of the ex-USSR in a very uncertain and vulnerable position between Russia and the newly enlarged Nato.
Any satisfactory strategy for security in Central and Eastern Europe must include Russia as a participant. Left outside, she is liable to become the menacing outlaw of European geopolitics (like Germany under the Versailles system). If she is brought in, there is at least a chance that she could become a powerful force for stability.
There are, after all, politicians in Russia who are not neo-imperialists and we should take the opportunity to strengthen them while we can. One such is President Boris Yeltsin who, on 28 February, proposed that international organisations should grant Russia 'special powers as guarantor of peace and stability in the region (of the ex-USSR)'. What he had in mind was that the security framework of the Commonwealth of Independent States should be strengthened to the point where it could act as a partner to Nato, charged with peacekeeping in the ex-USSR under the aegis of the UN or a reinforced CSCE.
Most Western commentators reacted to Yeltsin's proposals as if he were requesting carte blanche for Russia to throw its weight around. But do we have any alternative to suggest? It seems certain that we will not want to send the Cheshires to Abkhazia or Tajikistan.
Russia will be the principal power in the former USSR, whatever happens. Asking her to lead a peacekeeping organisation under the mandate of the UN may be the best way of harnessing her strengths while restraining her weaknesses.
If non-Russian Soviet republics would agree to it, this arrangement would also offer them the best guarantee of their security likely to be available at the moment.
Yours sincerely,
GEOFFREY HOSKING
Professor of Russian History
School of Slavonic and East European Studies
University of London
London, WC1
10 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments