Letter: The right way to train new teachers to educate the young

Professor David McNamara
Friday 11 June 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The Secretary of State for Education is proposing that teachers should make a significant contribution to the school-based training of primary teachers. I welcome this development, which should ensure that, as with other professions, established practitioners will contribute to educating new members.

But, if the teaching profession is to be given a measure of responsibility for teacher training, John Patten should attend to its views on the structure of the training programme itself. Teachers rightly reject one-year courses for the so-called 'mums' army'. True, anyone with a bit of worldly experience can child-mind infants.

Effective teaching in the early years, when the crucial foundations for learning are established, demands academically well-qualified, carefully trained and thoughtful teachers. This preparation is necessary if the teacher is to get 'inside the mind' of a five- year-old and ensure that the basic knowledge and concepts that provide the foundations for subsequent learning are acquired correctly.

This is recognised in the rest of the world (including the Third World), where the modal length of primary teacher education courses is three years. Since we are often invited to compare our economic and educational performance with our main international competitors, it is salutary to note that in Germany, for instance, primary teacher training takes a minimum of five years.

Yours sincerely,

DAVID McNAMARA

Professor of Primary Education

Department of Educational Studies

University of Hull

Hull

10 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in