Letter: The right to NHS care, the fear of growing old
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Alan Langlands
Sir: Your story "Doctors fear end of cradle-to-grave care" (24 February) gives the misleading impression that our guidance on continuing care takes away or reduces elderly people's right to free NHS care. The guidance does not change two fundamental principles that have been in place since the foundation of the welfare state in 1948.
First, that NHS care is provided, free at the point of delivery, to patients on the basis of clinical need, whatever their age. Crucially, it is doctors with nurses and other health and social services staff who decide whether a patient needs continuing care from the NHS.
Second, since 1948, there has been a widely recognised boundary between the responsibilities of the NHS and social services. The guidance does not shift that boundary. It does make it considerably clearer where the responsibilities of the NHS lie, by offering a comprehensive national framework of the full range of NHS responsibilities.
Yesterday's guidance requires health authorities to review all their continuing care services, including hospital beds, rehabilitation, and community health services. They will have to justify to us and to local people the range of continuing health care they fund. Where there are gaps, investment will have to be increased to fill them.
The guidance is clear about the discharge arrangements for frail and elderly people, it makes decisions about continuing care more transparent and it gives patients the right to have their case reviewed.
Notwithstanding the dismal response from the BMA, our guidance has been welcomed as a significant step forward by the Royal College of Nursing, the British Geriatrics Association, Age Concern, Carers' National Association and others. It will strengthen the contribution which the NHS makes to the care of the elderly.
Yours,
ALAN LANGLANDS
Chief Executive
NHS Executive
Leeds
24 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments