Letter: The riches of dialect
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: To require children to be taught to speak standard English, as opposed merely to writing it, ignores the overwhelming influence of the home in this most powerful area of early development. I worked for years to correct a particular local speech aberration, grammatically inaccurate in effect, in successive generations of pupils. They would say 'brought' when they meant 'bought'. I now meet some of them as adults and they still say 'brought'.
The commitment to standard English does not necessarily outlaw accents but it condemns the riches of dialect that have successfully served society for centuries. Moreover, there may be a disadvantaging backwash effect on accents if a mood returns to pervade life, leisure, employment, which says that people who sound like BBC newsreaders are somehow better than others.
Yours sincerely,
MERVYN BENFORD
Banbury,
Oxfordshire
15 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments