Letter: The pyramid's relics go from one tomb to another

Mr Robert G. Bauval
Tuesday 28 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was delighted to read the letter from W. V. Davies (15 December) entitled 'Ancient Egypt in a cigar box'. At long last the lost relics from the Great Pyramid have surfaced, 121 years after John Dixon brought them to London in November 1872.

I was particularly interested to note that the relics are still, even after 21 years somewhere in the British Museum, in Dixon's original cigar box. Presumably they have now been unpacked. I understand from I. E. S. Edwards, who was Keeper of Egyptian Antiquities in 1972 at the time the relics were presented to the museum by Mrs Porteous, great-granddaughter of Dixon, that he was given the privilege of a first view last Thursday. I am delighted to hear this, as Dr Edwards has been closely involved over the last few months in tracing the missing cigar box and the relics.

The suggestion reported by David Keys ('Sacred Egyptian relics said to lie under the Needle', 6 December) that the cigar box and the relics might have been placed by Dixon under Cleopatra's Needle in 1878 was not a guess, but the logical result of an extensive investigation. Since the start of the investigation in early September this year, the British Museum has repeatedly stated that the relics were not in its keeping and had never been. Thus Mr Keys' article, nearly four months after the matter was first raised, went to the next logical possibility: that the box containing cigars that we know Dixon placed under Cleopatra's Needle in 1878 might have been the same cigar box containing the relics. Dixon's Masonic connection made this a high probability. It is this bold journalistic tour de force that, very likely, gave the necessary impetus for the relics to be brought finally to light.

I hope that now, after so long a time, the general public will be allowed soon to see the relics on display.

Yours sincerely,

ROBERT G. BAUVAL

Giza, Cairo

18 December

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in