Letter: The problem of Europe's overflowing dustbin

Professor David Pearce,Ms Inger Brisson
Thursday 16 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article (16 July) on packaging waste is right to lament the UK's poor rate of materials recycling (glass 21 per cent, paper 33 per cent) compared with the Netherlands (70 per cent and 55 per cent). But it is wrong to hint that Germany's draconian packaging law - under which industry recycles or faces the statutory threat of all packaging being returnable ('waste mail' as one of our colleagues puts it) - is the route to go.

The German approach has concentrated on increasing the supply of recycled material but has done precious little to foster demand. The result has been the dumping of waste in other countries, including some developing countries, depressing the recycling industry there. Moreover, the German system sets arbitrary targets without any consideration for the costs and benefits of achieving those targets. Our calculations suggest the net cost to Germany could be three billion German marks per annum (around pounds 1bn per annum).

What the EC needs is a packaging tax so the industry receives a clear signal that the polluter must pay. The new EC directive on packaging waste allows governments to devise and implement such a tax. The Government's 1990 White Paper on the Environment entertained the idea of pollution taxes generally. It is time to stop dithering, and get on with it.

Yours,

DAVID PEARCE

Director

INGER BRISSON

Research Fellow

Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE)

University College London

London, WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in