Letter: The parable and the poverty trap

Mr Philip Angier
Tuesday 05 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In your report of Dr George Carey's Easter sermon ('Carey fuels row over gap between rich and poor', 4 April) you quote Tory MP John Watts as follows: 'He (Dr Carey) seems to think you make the poor better off by making the rich poorer. He should re-read the parable of the labourers in the vineyard . . .' (St Matthew's Gospel, Chapter 20).

What an interesting text to choose to refute Dr Carey's argument. According to the parable, the vineyard owner eschews market forces and adopts a voluntary 'minimum wage' code to pay each worker the same, even those who have only worked for part of the day. In so doing he sacrifices his wealth to offer his labourers, particularly the latecomers, a chance to escape the poverty trap and to earn a decent living. There is no mistaking the parable. If the wealthy vineyard owner had done the expected and paid on the basis of an hourly rather than a daily rate, the poor would have remained less well-off and he would have finished the day richer.

Yours faithfully,

PHILIP ANGIER

Newcastle upon Tyne

4 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in