Letter: The national lottery: charitable uses for the money
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Commenting on the national lottery, your leading article ('A flutter for the nation', 18 December) enthuses about using the money for spectacular projects and says: 'It would be worst of all if it were frittered on minor projects.' Frittering aside - why? The Association of Charitable Foundations' Committee of Inquiry into the uses of the lottery, whose report has just been published, concludes that two-thirds of the 'charitable' part of the proceeds should go to local and regional causes, including small community groups. They also show how it could be done. This is the wisest thing that has been said about distribution. It should be applied to the other categories as well. The overwhelming majority of voluntary organisations are local and small and largely run by their unpaid members. The lottery money will be collected at local level - research suggests disproportionately from those on lower incomes - and should benefit localities in return. Local initiatives in the arts, sports and heritage are similarly extensive and often struggling to survive and grow. There is nothing more 'major' than the aggregate of 'minor' projects. I suggest you reconsider what ingredients are most likely to result in a fritter.
Yours faithfully,
GABRIEL CHANAN
Director of Research
Community Development
Foundation
London, N3
18 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments