Letter: The 'mentalite' of England in 1492
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Danny Danziger's article '1492: if Columbus had come here' (10 October), was full of interesting and illuminating pieces of information, but, startingly, contained almost no mention of religion. In his tour of not-so- Merrie England, Mr Danziger almost disregards this feature of contemporary life, which was so central that 15th-century Englishmen would have found his picture of their country strangely alien.
There has been extensive scholarly debate about the significance of religion to the man on the late- medieval Clapham ox-cart, but none has denied that the outward manifestations of religion, the festivals determining the rhythm of the year, the religious guilds offering support and fellowship, and the rites of passage regulated by the church, were of profound importance to community life. Furthermore, without religion, especially as formally expounded by the church, the intellectual justifications for prevailing ideas about politics and society, indeed the whole medieval thought-world, meant nothing.
Albeit unintentionally, by concentrating on material life, Mr Danziger has left us with a picture of life in England in 1492 as simply, as it were, backward, poor, nasty, brutish and short.
By neglecting what French historians call the mentalite of the age, and especially its religious context, he has underplayed a difference between ourselves and our ancestors of five centuries ago which is at least as important as standard of living, and that is the secularisation of our thought.
Yours faithfully,
ROBERT FRANKLIN
London, E8
10 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments