Letter: The long and short of the height issue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I strongly disagree with the gist of Tim Harrison's (3 August) article on British attitudes to height. His historical building references are valid but they are no more than just history.
I take it that Mr Harrison is himself a tall person but, surprisingly, he doesn't exactly wave the flag for us. Has he failed to notice the current success of such business 'giants' as Lord Hanson and Michael Heseltine and, on the military front, what about Colin Powell and Stormin' Norman? Just in case anyone was shallow enough to take the article as verging upon gospel, may I dispel the notion that tall people are proportionately 'shyer, less ambitious and more likely to stand down in an argument' than their sub- 6ft 3in counterparts? Anyone care for a heated debate on the
subject?
Yours faithfully,
CLIVE DAVIS
Wembley, Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments