LETTER: The legal duty of those who care

Mr Richard Gordon,Qc
Thursday 28 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Richard Gordon, QC

Sir: Stephen Laudat is a schizophrenic who stabbed his fellow inmate 82 times at a day centre in Newham. Relatively isolated incidents such as this inevitably make national headlines, as do the inquiries that always follow.

The Woodley report, sensible so far as it goes, points to inadequate funding for the mentally ill. True but, as the philosophers say, uninteresting. The underlying poverty at the heart of this government's care programme approach is the absence of any legally enforceable duties on the part of those responsible for providing services. Because of the elastic wording of the legislation, social services departments know that they can plead lack of resources and that the courts are powerless.

Minor amendments to the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 would enable the High Court, in judicial review, to declare inadequate community care provision to be unlawful. This, more than inquiry recommendations or even media headlines, would force the Government to act. It is the only effective means of reducing the prospect of further tragedies, such as Clunis and Laudat.

Yours faithfully,

Richard Gordon

London, WC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in