Letter: The increased price of legalising cannabis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article (2 October) is based on three wrong premisses. Because cannabis is not physically addictive, and because it is relatively freely available, albeit illegally, at a relatively low price, raising money to indulge in this illegal habit is not a significant motivation to commit crime. Legalisation would therefore do little to reduce crime associated with cannabis purchase.
If cannabis, or any other drugs, were available completely control- free then, as with alcohol, the increased cost to individuals, to business and commerce and to the Exchequer would be enormous, because of increased time off work, more traffic accidents from driving under the influence of drugs, and the need for increased health care for drug takers and those affected by their actions. If it was not completely control-free, then a black market would continue, and the crime associated with that black market would continue as well; indeed it is possible that crime would actually increase, because there would be more people in the pool of drug takers to be tempted into it.
Any lessening of controls would inevitably increase consumption, by more individuals consuming greater quantities. There is now, sadly, a proven link between the serious misuse of cannabis and serious psychological disorders, such as schizophrenia, and physical damage, particularly to reproductive organs.
The Government has been continuing its international efforts to control and reduce production and traffic in drugs; but these can only succeed in conjunction with improved demand-reduction activities, especially through improved health-education teaching in schools. I hope that local health education co-ordinators will soon receive the direct support from Government which was so unfortunately ended last April.
It is also imperative that proper treatment for drug misusers is readily available, so that the pool of misusers is reduced. The Government's policy for Care in the Community must be applied in such a way that sufficient professional treatment is provided. The danger of a Royal Commission is that Government efforts on all fronts would be diminished pending its conclusions. That would be a tragedy for the security - and the health - of everybody, everywhere.
Yours faithfully,
TIM RATHBONE
MP for Lewes (Con)
House of Commons
London, SW1
The writer is Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Drug Misuse Group.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments