Letter: The ideal Dome

John R. Catch
Monday 12 January 1998 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter: The ideal Dome

Sir: The Great Exhibition of 1851 started with clear objectives, which were largely realised, and an ideal of peace on earth which we still, alas, await. The building was an afterthought, thoroughly utilitarian, and, as it happened, a stroke of genius.

In the Millennium Dome we have been sold an architectural engineer's very costly dream, and if there have been objectives and ideals about its use they have hitherto been successfully concealed from this reader. A hypermarket for supernatural beliefs? Including the Moonies and Scientologists and spaceship suicide cults? The selection committee will have an unenviable job. Prince Albert and Henry Cole, the civil servant who was the driving force behind the Great Exhibition, would think their successors crazy.

Public alarm in 1850-51 was over revolting foreigners, licentious mobs, intolerable pressure on supplies and services in London, industrial espionage, safety of the building, irreversible damage to Hyde Park, and Colonel Sibthorpe's phobia of technology. None of these things worries us today. What is worrying is the huge expenditure on an astonishingly hazy project of resources which are urgently needed for well- defined national needs.

JOHN R CATCH

Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in