Letter: The human cost of fund-holding

Dr A. C. Markus
Tuesday 27 May 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I write as the retired senior partner of a non-fund-holding practice, in response to your article "GP's pounds 513,000 expansion raises fear over profits" (26 May).

When fund-holding was introduced, it was generously funded. In addition GPs were told that savings on this notional budget (mainly through reduced prescribing costs) could be transferred to "other aspects of patient care". These include the employment of health care personnel and the provision of improved buildings for patient services.

Bearing in mind the fact that buildings become the property of the doctors concerned, and may be sold on retirement to their own financial advantage, GPs are faced with a clear conflict of interest. This arrangement was a cynical move by the Conservative government to entice GPs towards fund- holding. Is it a wonder that some may take advantage of the situation? We are all human, and have our price.

Whilst sorting out the mess the NHS is in, the new Labour government should act quickly to abolish this conflict of interest by making it impossible for any savings from the fund-holding budget to be used to enhance GPs' equity.

Dr A C MARKUS

Thame, Oxfordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in