Letter: The fall-out over Chernobyl

Kirsten Bindemann Nicole Foss
Saturday 11 April 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YOUR article "Lethal legacy" (Section 2, 5 April) discusses the (lack of) structural integrity of the Chernobyl sarcophagus. Funds for the sarcophagus were part of a 1995 agreement between the Ukraine and the G7 which was intended to ensure the decommissioning of Chernobyl by 2000. This goal is now in doubt because the issue is being used as a political bargaining ploy by both the East and the West. As yet only a fraction of the sum needed has been raised, and the bargaining process is delaying the urgent need for repairs.

While Chernobyl is obviously important, there are several other nuclear plants of the same flawed design in Russia (Kursk, Smolensk, Leningrad) and Lithuania (Ignalina) as well as other plants that are considered to be unsafe, for example Kozloduy in Bulgaria. These should arguably receive the same attention.

The issue of nuclear safety does not appear to be addressed with any intellectual consistency. This is reflectedalso in the dramatic decrease in spending on nuclear R&D over the past decade. Without sufficient R&D the dilemma of nuclear problems such as waste disposal will never be adequately solved.

Kirsten Bindemann Nicole Foss Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in