Letter: The crisis created by Khrushchev and Kennedy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The main lesson of the Cuban missile crisis is, as Robert McNamara concluded, ('At daggers drawn', 6 October), that as long as the control of nuclear warheads remains dependent on human fallibility, the nuclear holocaust is a near certainty.
What also struck those of us who endured the 13 days in October 1962 when 'the world teetered on the edge of the nuclear abyss' was that we were likely to be eliminated without consultation - neither Britain's 'independent' nuclear weapons, let alone Nato, were the least bit relevant. Our survival was entirely in the hands of Kennedy and Khrushchev. Next time it could be a Saddam Hussein or some other world dictator who determines our fate. As Mr McNamara concludes, 'the world must move back to a non-nuclear age' - or else.
Yours faithfully,
SHEILA JONES
London, NW3
7 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments