Letter: The church needs frankness, rather than apologies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As one member of the General Synod who has been in the fore in criticising the Church Commissioners both before and since their serious financial difficulties came to light, I welcome Frank Field's letter to Dr Carey (Section II, 16 February).
He is right to stress the serious situation facing the Church of England at this time. This calls for firm leadership from the Archbishop of Canterbury and his fellow bishops. They must try to ensure that the run-down in the commissioners' allocation to parishes is, as far as is possible, spread out over two or three years so that the whole parish system is not put at risk.
Where I disagree with Mr Field is in his call for more public apologies. A full apology was given to church members by a leading commissioner, the Bishop of Chelmsford, at last November's meeting of the General Synod.
This is not the time for further recriminations, but for frankness from the commissioners. I agree with Mr Field that Sir Michael Colman, the new First Church Estates Commissioner, has made an encouraging start and deserves the church's backing in his efforts to reform the commissioners. What I believe church members also want to see is that the reform involves some immediate and further significant reduction in the pounds 12m administrative costs of the commissioners and allied bodies.
Mr Field writes that the 'laity are not going to give money to the commissioners'. No one is asking them to do so, but what we are being challenged to do is to double our average weekly giving to around pounds 5, not an insuperable task.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID WEBSTER
Tunbridge Wells, Kent
16 February
The writer is a member of the Central Board of Finance of the Church of England.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments