Letter: The Balkans crisis in historical perspective
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Although Lord Blake's article ('Steer clear of the Balkans', 24 August) is of interest in attempting to draw historical parallels between the current atrocities in the former Yugoslavia and the Balkan crisis of 1876, it nevertheless fails to argue convincingly the case for nonintervention.
The underlying tenet of Lord Blake's argument is that had Disraeli followed the course of intervention, then Britain would have become embroiled in a war with Turkey, which in turn would have exposed that most precious jewel in the British Empire, India, to Russian expansionist aspirations.
In 1992, however, Britain has no colonial interests that could be conceivably undermined or threatened by committing 1,800 troops to Bosnia-Herzegovina. In fact, besides the obvious and not inconsiderable merits of giving aid to innocent and helpless victims of a cruel and futile war, British, as well as US and French military intervention under the auspices of the United Nations could result in convincing the Serbian leadership that mindless imperialism under the banner of racial purity is intolerable to the West.
Ironically, therefore, intervention may result in the exact opposite of Lord Blake's hypothesis; once the Western military presence is established in Bosnia- Herzegovina, the Serbs are likely to consider the stakes too high for military engagement on any scale. Intervention could be the first step towards restoring the status quo ante in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Yours faithfully,
REZA KHOSROWSHAHI
London, SW1
24 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments