Letter: Teachers want the very best for their pupils
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The only conclusion Bryan Appleyard would have us draw from his cynical and pessimistic piece ('A test for Thatcher's children', 9 June) is that any self-respecting parents with a few bob should send their child into private-sector education.
He contends that the teaching 'establishment' (his words) is squirming. He intimates that teachers intend to 'forget about education'. He implies that self-expression and theatre workshops are uneducational and suggests teachers ignore spelling errors.
Teachers are not 'wavering', Mr Appleyard, they are teaching. They do not fall into the two camps of 'caring, egalitarian and holistic' or 'imposing, competitive, classical' he describes. No two teachers are alike; no two schools are alike. Contrary to Mr Appleyard's belief, however, teachers are united on one thing, regardless of whether they are in the private or public sector: they want the absolute best for the children they teach.
To argue that John Patten's standards are low and minimalist and to conclude that 'this is the right thing to do' is absurd. Subjects which require reasoning, imagination and linguistic dexterity cannot be assessed by box-ticking and synonym identification.
Mr Appleyard admires the 'products' of schools in Japan, Korea, Malaysia and China. He suggests that our schoolchildren will be unable to achieve jobs, prosperity and freedom if they cannot compete with these 'products'.
Jobs and prosperity come from a successful economy, not from a child's ability to tick boxes. The real failure in this country is that of a political system that puts up John Major as leader, then reels back amazed when he fails to achieve.
Yours faithfully,
NICHOLAS R. PERRY
Polebrook, Northamptonshire
9 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments