Letter: Teachers in inner-city schools deserve congratulations

Dr Tony Dodd
Thursday 09 May 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: You report (8 May) on the Ofsted report on reading in primary schools in three London boroughs and the comments by Gillian Shephard, the Secretary of State for Education, indicating a failure in teaching methods. It would seem that primary teachers are rather to be congratulated on their success in raising the level of pupils, where the report already acknowledges that many schools have "higher than average" numbers of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds and many are from families where English is not the first language.

On the figures indicated, only four out of ten 11-year-olds have reading ages below their chronological age, where statistically one would expect this to be very close to 50 per cent nationwide. This presumably is a substantial achievement by the children, parents and certainly the primary teachers of Islington, Southwark and Tower Hamlets.

While perhaps the improvement from the figures indicating 80 per cent as being below the national average at seven years of age should be attributed to those teaching at junior level, nevertheless it does seem highly unlikely that these three boroughs should provide so much better quality of teaching at Key Stage Two rather than at Key Stage One. On the contrary, it would appear that infant teachers are laying the groundwork for the later success of these pupils and more support for bilingual children would hasten this still further.

Dr Tony Dodd

Scarborough, North Yorkshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in