Letter: Taxpayers should be happy to subsidise the unemployed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I could not agree more with John Philpott that there is a need "for a grown-up debate on solutions to mass unemployment" (9 April). However, the solution he prefers of subsidising jobs for the long-term unemployed does not come near to addressing the long-term problem: the technological revolution is destroying jobs; increasing globalisation means that a growing percentage of work that remains will find its way to low-wage economies.
It is now sadly clear that the vision we had some decades ago of a four- day week and more leisure time for all is a myth only realisable in a benevolent dictatorship - in practice there will be an increasing number working for long hours and little pay servicing the few who are also working long hours, but for a lot of pay.
But even with growing wealth there will not be enough service jobs for all. We need to change our attitude to employment. Instead of despising those who do not want to work, should we not be grateful that there are some who are happy to lead their life without it?
Should we not be encouraging the "drop-outs", be happy that they are willing to live on a minimum income, and not begrudge the fact that, as taxpayers, we are subsidising them?
Janet Falush
London SW13
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments