Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It's worrying that J M Murphy (letter, 1 February) evokes that old chestnut, the "taxpayer" argument, to justify misgivings over the A30 protesters.
All Swampy and colleagues did was to exercise their right in a democratic society to freedom of speech.
The sinister but logical extension of the Murphy view is that we, as taxpayers, should not support any form of protest - for example by funding the policing of marches.
Freedom of speech is use-dependent: we either use it or lose it.
If the Murphy view is upheld, it will be lost, and we'll all end up doing what we're told.
TIM CHEEK
Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments