Letter: Tax-free arts donations mean money for the top
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TAX-FREE donations are an indirect subsidy to the arts, since the Exchequer forgoes revenue it would otherwise collect ("Government plans tax deal to boost arts funding", 18 October). The preferences of donors rather than that of policy-makers determine where this subsidy is spent. Donors who pay higher rates of taxation are the ones most likely to contribute to the arts. Should they choose to make all their donations to the Royal Opera House, no one could say nay. This makes a mockery of a policy on the arts that emphasises greater access.
It could be argued that funding for the arts has been "democratised" via the National Lottery, which is a "voluntary tax" that gives in part to the arts. But lottery players are not able to choose which organisations receive their "subsidy", as are donors. There is no obvious political accountability. Any measure that breaks the routine cycle of subsidy to the arts being spent year-in year-out on large, elite, London-based organisations is to be welcomed. At least in principle, who gets what from direct subsidy can be controlled. Not so with indirect subsidy.
RUTH TOWSE
School of Business and Economics, Exeter University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments