Letter: Tapers are copying music they have already paid for
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE British Phonographic Industry's statement that it loses pounds 140m every year through home taping is ludicrous ('Tape levy threatens newspapers for the blind', 22 August). Most taping is of records/CDs already owned by that person for their personal stereo/car etc. People I know who home tape create their own compilation tapes, so the copyright owner will already have received a royalty.
Undoubtedly there are people who do tape records/CDs which they do not own. However, I cannot believe that there are many who tape when they could buy, unless they cannot afford to do so.
If blank tapes did not exist the increase in income for the music business would be minimal. The BPI's figures are disingenuous because it wants a levy, and who can blame it? Any industry would jump at the chance of having a special tax on consumers, collected by the Government and handed to it on a plate for doing nothing at all.
Stephen Beckett
Birmingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments