Letter: Take the slow train

Stephen Plowden
Sunday 17 May 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter: Take the slow train

Sir: There is no way of realising James Murphy's dream (letter, 15 May) of a train journey between Newcastle and Paris taking only five hours. The total market for travel between the North-east and Greater Paris is relatively small. Air is always likely to be both quicker and cheaper than train. The potential demand for rail could never support an adequate frequency of service.

The current British fascination with high-speed trains contrasts with a growing disillusion with them on the Continent. High-speed trains are not environmentally friendly. Both fuel consumption and noise increase sharply with speed. If the trains require new tracks, they are immensely intrusive; if they use existing tracks, they very much reduce the capacity for freight and for local passenger trains.

The Channel Tunnel rail link is not the only high-speed rail project that should be urgently re-examined. The reconstruction of the West Coast main line to enable it to carry high-speed trains will cost at least pounds 2bn. This is a huge diversion of resources from less glamorous but far more worthwhile rail investment.

STEPHEN PLOWDEN

London NW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in