LETTER: Successful prostate cancer screening
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr E. P. Neil O'Donoghue, FRCS
Sir: The only sensible objective of a screening programme for prostate cancer is to detect early prostatic cancer in those younger men who could otherwise expect a full life but whose lives are at risk ("Catching a killer can do more harm than good", 30 January). There is little point in screening 75-year-olds with heart disease or other infirmities that will limit their survival.
It is also essential to recognise that our current screening tests are relatively insensitive and will not detect microscopic cancers which are compatible with prolonged survival. Those of us who offer curative surgery are (and must remain) selective in our approach. My personal experience of some 200 radical prostatectomies reaffirms the conviction that there is little risk of unnecessary surgery in the UK, but far too often we are faced with patients whose disease is too extensive for cure because the opportunities presented to us for early detection are rejected.
The Department of Health is quoted as saying that "the case for a national [screening] programme has not been established", hence its unwillingness to fund or promote a large-scale study. Current policies towards prostatic cancer may be defended thus, but meanwhile younger men continue to die unnecessarily and painfully of this disease.
Yours faithfully,
Neil O'Donoghue
Consultant Urologist
Prostate Research Campaign UK
Northwood, Middlesex
31 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments