Letter: Student disciplinary procedures: where responsibility lies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Torode's analysis of the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals' interim report on student disciplinary proceedings seriously misunderstands the meaning of the report and the nature of universities (Open Letter, 19 April).
The report is now out for consultation in universities and has not been 'leaked'. In writing it, our task force has consulted Judge Marcus Edwards, from whose report on the Austen Donnellan case Mr Torode quotes. Our draft guidelines are nowhere in disagreement with the judge's report.
The guidance says that universities must always refer allegations of serious crime to the police. The report distinguishes between the action to be taken in these cases, and the action that might result from, say, slight damage to university property. The police do not normally wish to be involved with such minor offences and may well take no action. We are advised that the police would be happier for the university to act, rather than leave such minor offences unpunished.
The report admits that there is a fairly large grey area of crimes that fall between the trivial and the grave. The circumstances in which the crime is committed and the nature of the community in which the university is situated, are crucial factors in deciding what to do. In these cases, the report says, universities should seek legal advice and consult the local police.
We reject absolutely Mr Torode's facile suggestion that universities should only consider cases of academic misconduct, such as cheating in exams. Would a finance house take no action against an employee found guilty of assault on a colleague, merely because his crime was not financial?
Universities are not seeking to place themselves or their students above the law - quite the reverse. They are seeking to ensure that it is properly and fairly applied to all those for whom the university is responsible.
Yours faithfully,
KENNETH EDWARDS
Chairman
Committee of Vice-Chancellors
and Principals of
the Universities of the UK
London, WC1
19 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments