LETTER: Strike highlights bus safety threat

Bill Morris
Thursday 12 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Bill Morris Sir: The managing director of the Eastern National Bus Company (Letters, 10 January) ignores the real issue at stake in his dispute with the Chelmsford bus drivers. Our members were sacked by Robin Orbell because they took action to highlight their concern over the longer shifts they were being forced to work. This question is causing increasing alarm, not just throughout the industry, but also among the travelling public. It was highlighted by the accident in Whitehall over Christmas, which

one of the drivers involved attributed to fatigue cause by overwork.

It is concern for safety, as much as the free bus service, which the Transport and General Workers Union is running in Chelmsford, that has led to our members receiving such strong support from the public. The question for Mr Orbell is whether he is prepared to put passenger safety (which means not forcing tired drivers on to the roads) above profit.

With regard to the letter from Angie Chapman (10 January), my conversation with her was in fact about a complaint that I had not responded to a letter she had written about the dispute. I explained to her that the letter would have been received just before the Christmas break, over which the T&G had moved its offices, and that she would receive a reply very shortly.

Yours sincerely, BILL MORRIS General Secretary Transport and General Workers Union London, SW1

11 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in