LETTER:Stranded statues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Williams
Sir: While agreeing with the comments on the Strand ("How the Strand could be grand", 5 June) I feel, as the architect for the recent refurbishment of Zimbabwe House, that I must defend the British Medical Association from accusations of defacing the Epstein sculptures on the facade of 429 Strand.
In fact, the BMA was their staunch defender when the building's facade was unveiled in 1908, and it was not until 1937 that the new owners, the government of Southern Rhodesia (who thought they did not set the right tone for a government building) found an excuse to remove them when, it is said, in taking down bunting put up to celebrate King George VI's coronation, parts of the sculptures broke off, allowing chisels to be applied to these "unsafe" works.
The passions that these statues still arouse can be judged from the representations received when the recent refurbishment was proposed, not only from those who wanted restoration, but even from those who feared just such action. As the Rhodesians would not allow casts of the figures to be taken prior to their attack, restoration would have been very difficult and beyond the project's budget. Therefore, work was limited to cleaning and some preservation work to minimise any further deterioration, leaving the question of restoration to future generations.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID WILLIAMS
CBDW Architecture
Whitchurch,
Hampshire
5 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments