Letter: Statistical odds that combined to cause the grand fiasco at Aintree
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: There seem to have been four factors that together combined to create the Grand National fiasco on Saturday: animal rights protesters getting on to the course; the foul weather; the inadequate starting mechanism; and the man who did not flag. Statistically these four factors were not independent of each other, but it would be realistic to say that the chance of all four factors happening together might have been something between 100-1 and 1,000-1 against. Few people would back a horse with odds like those.
There are other just-as-likely disasters waiting to happen in this and other sports, with equally catastrophic consequences on the sport in question. A jockey could be killed or severely injured in the race or animal rights activists could run suicidally on to the course in front of the horses. No one wants disaster, but every disaster has its odds. The question is, what odds are acceptable? 1,000-1? 1,000,000-1? If so, we can ultimately say goodbye to motor racing, cricket, rugby and indeed any activity in life that carries any amount of risk.
Let the authorities strive to reduce obvious risks, but let's also be realistic. Risk and failure are some of the things that make sport interesting, and one thing is for sure - for me as Joe Public this was the most interesting Grand National since Red Rum overtook Crisp.
Yours faithfully,
ROBERT EASTAWAY
London, SE22
3 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments