Letter: Starved research
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Harrison ("Paying for the new pioneers", 17 April) draws attention to the research funding crisis faced by UK universities. However, his suggested solution (even greater selectivity) depends on a number of implausible assumptions:
1) that departmental (and in effect, institutional) "research ratings" have sufficient validity to justify funding decisions;
2) that the (rated) past performance of academics is a valid guide for prediction;
3) that data of poor validity relating to the performance of other academics who happened in the past to have been in their departments or institutions, provide a valid basis for predicting the future discoveries of other academics.
The nation will not be well served by funding bodies that behave like this. The problem is the underfunding of the system as a whole. This is the problem that must be addressed in the coming general election.
P K Burgess
Department. of Psychology
Dundee University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments