LETTER:Standing in the shadows of art
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Margaret Miller
Sir: In an old cartoon, a man at a private view stands in front of a painting and says out loud to himself: "I know a lot about art, but I don't know what I like."
Last week, Alan Bennett's original and open-minded lecture on My National Gallery ("I know what I like, but I'm not sure about art," 24 May) was in contrast to Andrew Graham-Dixon's disturbing attack on "Shadows", Ernst Gombrich's selected exhibition at the National Gallery ("Every silver lining needs a cloud", 23 May). Graham-Dixon seemed to be marking out a very large territory as his alone. There is a place for his rich, subjective interpretations of Caravaggio's Supper at Emmaus, or the (School of) Rembrandt Scholar in a Lofty Room, even if they do skate dangerously close to over- interpretation, but there is also room for the clear, focused purity of Gombrich's wall labels, which are about as objective as it is possible to be. They give us less to read, and force us to look at the pictures for ourselves.
Graham-Dixon misses the point when he complains that "Shadows" reflects only a "half-formed thesis". A fully formed thesis might be restrictive and premature in Gombrich's long search for ways to help solve the riddle of style: "Why is it that different ages and different nations have represented the visible world in such different ways?" (Art and Illusion)
He also accuses Gombrich of self-indulgence, and seems to regard him as a trespasser. But that is the great, creative fun of the National Gallery's occasional invitations to people to select and hang temporary exhibitions from the collection.
In addition to Alan Bennett's suggestion that there could be a notice in the National Gallery saying, "You don't have to like everything," there could also be one saying, "You don't always have to be serious in here."
Yours faithfully,
MARGARET MILLER
Coventry
28 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments