Letter: Stagnant secrecy over clean water
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article 'Clean water, dirty river' (20 December) appears to accept undiluted the bilge that has leaked from the water, pesticides and chemical industries lobby over the past few months. The consumer and the environment, while certainly mentioned, are allowed to languish in a backwater created by the flood of criticism that has been directed at the cost of clean water while having its source in the profits of the industries.
The truth, none the less, does bob to the surface occasionally. All of these European directives that are the subjects of your complaints were adopted unanimously by the ministers, who included British ministers. The urban waste water directive, in particular, was even anticipated in its effect by an announcement by Chris Patten when he was Secretary of State for the Environment. Until recently, British ministers were at pains to tell us how much better their performance was than popular opinion believed. The thing that has changed is that, at least in England and Wales, the water industry is privatised and is keen to pass all costs to the consumer without drawing too much public attention to profits, salaries, dividends, etc.
The European Parliament will be fully involved in any review of these water directives. My committee will listen to the evidence presented to it in the light of scientific, economic and political opinion and will accept revision where it is consistent with the best attainable results for the consumer and the environment.
It is unfair to complain that absurdities are 'European' when, in fact, they were produced by the ultimate absurdity of 12 national ministers reaching agreement in a stagnant pool of secrecy while suffering from as many kinds of tunnel vision as there are member states.
Yours sincerely,
KEN COLLINS
Chairman
Committee on the Environment
Public Health and Consumer Protection
European Parliament
Brussels
20 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments