Letter: Squeezing the Tube
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The fascinating contrast between the 1909 and 'modern' maps of the Underground system is of considerable interest. Perhaps the director of the V & A was right to decry the hideous 1909 map (report, 17 January). Although it shows the Underground lines in bold colour in relation to the streets, the lengths and orientations of those very streets are not correct.
The complicated part in central London is reasonably accurate, but the northern and southern margins are squeezed into the oblong. The remarkable thing is that these early maps of the Underground are distorted, but masquerade as accurate because they show streets as well.
Yours etc,
CHRISTOPHER BOARD
Senior Lecturer in Geography
London School of Economics
London, WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments