Letter: Spot checks at UK points of entry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is to be welcomed that an agreement has been reached between Kenneth Clarke, the Home Secretary, and the EC Internal Market Commissioner, Martin Bangemann, to allow the UK to maintain spot checks at UK points of entry on EC citizens entering the country (report, 3 August). However, once the efficacy of checks on immigration and imports at external points of entry into all Community countries can be demonstrated, surely these checks should be random and generally perfunctory.
The UK government rightly contends that checks are to ensure that non-EC citizens do not interfere with the rights of free movement of persons and goods within the EC. These rights are, of course, guaranteed by the 1987 Single European Act (no Maastricht innovations these).
At the same time, some sense of balance must be kept. Border checks may well help in the detection of illegal importation of pets. However, the value of border checks in relation to EC citizens for the detection of drug trafficking, illegal immigration and terrorism is in danger of being overstated. Most drug seizures are not made at borders and terrorists are rarely caught there.
The interests of us all as individuals and the convenience of business, and so British prosperity, lie in ease of passage between member states.
Yours faithfully,
NICHOLAS BOURNE
London, E18
The writer is Professor of Law at Swansea Law School
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments