Letter: South Bank needs debate, not prejudice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER Popham, in "A duel of lady versus knight" (21 January), tries to discredit the views of an active and highly respected woman in the field of architecture who dares to criticise Sir Richard Rogers's proposals for the South Bank by painting her that bane of British men, a "bluestocking", a bookish Mary Poppins.
That she is responsible for the Sir John Soane Museum and the new exhibition room designed by Eva Jiricna as well as being president of the Twentieth Century Society proves how broad her range is, far from the dusty depths Mr Popham suggests. A passionate defence of the South Bank is crucial to a thorough debate on the future of these important contemporary buildings in the capital and should not to be dismissed as the quirky opinions of a few preservationists.
If Sir Richard had been available, would his comments have been preceded by details of his trousers, hairstyle and boyish grin?
Maria A Hellman
London W3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments