Letter: Sources of the Church's capital
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Martyn Rogers (letter, 18 July) refers to the Church of England being financed by 'dead men's money'; this is a myth. Endowments are not, to any significant degree, from past bequests. Not much 'belongs' to the Church, except in the sense that your readers' taxes 'belong' to the Government.
The Church Commissioners' millions come largely from three sources. First, commutation of tithes - a tax on land, granted by Norman kings after the precedent set by Charlemagne, converted to a rent-charge in money terms by the Tithe Commutation Act of 1836, and 'redeemed' by lump-
sum purchase in the 1940s.
Second, the manors and other land given by the Crown to bishoprics, etc - the medieval system of financing positions created within the feudal system, rationalised in the 19th century by the ecclesiastical commissioners. Third, Queen Anne's Bounty: a pious gift by Her Majesty to relieve the poorer clergy, whose ecclesiastical superiors (and their predecessors) had ignored the 'trickle-down' principle of the feudal system's economics.
The Church Commissioners greatly increased this endowment capital by skilful asset management in times of boom, and have reduced it again through much less skilful management in recession. This loss makes them less able to bail out Church members who do not contribute enough to pay running costs, and less able to maintain the Church of England as a state institution for non-members' weddings and funerals.
Losses from property speculation may be deplorable, but do not affect the argument that Church members should be interested and committed enough to support the living Church. But I fear that the C of E is more committee'd than committed.
Yours faithfully,
TIM BELBEN
General Synod Member for
Bath & Wells
Wells, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments