Letter: Social consequences of the Great War
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his bold challenge to myths about the social consequences of the Great War ('When the men came home', 12 November), Gerald de Groot is about 30 years behind the times.
My The Deluge: British Society and the First World War, published in 1965, and continuously in print ever since, provided a precise assessment of what changed and what did not. Because this book launched a generation of war-and-society studies, those who prefer inventing myths so that they can attack them, to grasping a complex analysis, chose to represent it as attributing all subsequent change to the war.
Really there are no excuses: the long introduction to the new edition of The Deluge, published a couple of years ago, spells out the profound problems of historical explanation which lie in the way of jumping to facile conclusions either way.
Yours faithfully,
ARTHUR MARWICK
London, NW3
13 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments