Letter: Social change and the housing market
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Building society forecasts about house prices and the state of the market rarely take account of the changed state of things in Britain ('Halifax expects house prices to outstrip inflation by 1995', 29 December). House ownership is no longer regarded as the best way to enhance family equity by young people in business and the professions. This is not just because of the recent fall in house values. Other factors that make many young people prefer to rent rather than buy are the decline in tenure in professional appointments, and the general expectation among employers in both private and state sectors that personnel must be mobile, and prepared to up sticks to work in a new place.
The impact of such unsettlement on families is catastrophic in many cases. The hassle of selling and buying on disadvantageous terms is one thing; the disruption of schooling, if the family moves successfully, or of family life, if the breadwinner moves out leaving the rest of the nuclear group where the mortgaged house remains, is another thing, painful and often unbearable. The steep rise in executive and professional unemployment during the long slump has aggravated matters.
It is as if the Thatcherite desideratum of 'a property-owning democracy' has been deliberately sabotaged by the Thatcherite pursuit of business and professional efficiency, which turns out to be cruel to people and to promote social instability.
Yours faithfully,
BRIAN STONE
London W8
30 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments