Letter: Social benefits with no room for discretion

Mr Philip Boyd
Wednesday 29 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: However much one might agree with the Earl Russell that the Child Support Act formula 'must allow an element of discretion', I fear his plea (letter, 28 December) will fall on deaf ears. Government policy for the past 10 years has been to set its face firmly against any kind of discretion and to apply a strict, inflexible formula in all social security matters, as any recipient of income support, family credit or housing/council tax benefit could tell the Noble Lord.

The financial circumstances of one poor pensioner, of one single parent or of one low-income family are as various as the families themselves, but they have all suffered the inequities of what Lord Russell describes as 'formula fetishism' since the mid-1980s. Applicants for house renovation grants and legal aid are similarly treated, and the proposed incapacity benefit will apply a formula of physical and mental incapacity.

It may be that the Government will be persuaded to abandon the formula-based 'common means test' as the basis of child support if it begins to see middle-class men caught by the CSA provisions deserting it in droves. Should this be the case, will Lord Russell and his colleagues make the same plea for the poor, elderly and sick?

Yours faithfully,

PHILIP BOYD

Cheslyn Hay, Staffordshire

28 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in