Letter: 'Slow death' of St Bartholomew's: tragic or beneficial?

Dr D. H. Roberts
Sunday 19 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I welcome your balanced treatment ('Bart's faces slow death in hospital reforms', 16 December) of Virgina Bottomley's statement on 15 December. I have serious doubts about health service 'reform', with its purchaser-provider marketplace emphasis, if only because I see little evidence for the necessary management competence on the purchaser side of that relationship. However, in the context of London medicine I believe that the reforms advocated by Tomlinson, and taken forward by the London Implementation Group, are necessary and ultimately beneficial.

In particular, I believe that great credit is due to the Secretary of State for making decisions which run counter to orchestrated public relations campaigns but which do take full account of the position of University College London hospitals 'as a world centre of medical teaching and research' - and for that reason 'ensures that UCLH have a secure future'.

Under questioning, Mrs Bottomley said 'a managed market has always been the intention of the National Health Service changes'.

That should be good news for all - not just London.

Yours sincerely,

D. H. ROBERTS

Provost

University College London

London, WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in