Letter: Slavery was 'competitive'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Your article on working hours, "No rest for the British" (4 August), makes one feel ashamed to live in a country whose government encourages slave labour and, from time to time, boasts about it. While opting out of virtually every progressive aspect of EU legislation, this government defends itself with cries of a need to be "competitive".
Have our European partners no equivalent needs? What is the real reason? The answer becomes patently clear when one hears, only in the last few days, a transport minister defending the fat railway cats' bonanza while at the same time threats are being issued of further erosion of workers' rights.
It is to be hoped that an incoming Labour government will reverse the Tory hostility towards the EU's more civilised approach to working conditions. I am sure many would applaud a clear statement to this effect.
Harry Karnac
Ruislip, Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments