Letter: 'Sick trash' from anguish of Goya
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your piece on the contemporary art market ('Arresting art explores dark side of humanity', 10 October) reports that Charles Saatchi has paid pounds 18,000 for a sculpture assembled from shop mannequins and based on one of Goya's most disturbing images of his Disasters of War series. The article said: 'It depicts three members of the Spanish resistance who have been stripped, castrated and tied to a tree.'
Perhaps it is a philosophical point to discuss the 'nationality' of mutilated corpses, but Goya's image actually portrays the bodies of three French soldiers who fell into the hands of Spanish partisans. The significance is that Disasters are not chauvinist propaganda cataloguing the outrages of an invading army but deal with the horrors of war. Goya was courageous enough to depict atrocities committed by both sides.
Goya's original work shows atrocity feeding on atrocity and is a powerful indictment of the brutalities of war, as relevant to Bosnia today as to Spain in the last century. Yet the artists of the sculpture assembly described in your article call the horrific image of dismembered corpses 'an object of pleasurable transgression'. While it would be thus easy to dismiss the artists as the peddlers of sick trash, perhaps the pertinent question might be to ask why Charles Saatchi is giving them money.
Yours sincerely,
RUSSELL VALLANCE
Farnham, Surrey
13 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments