Letter: Shot in the arm for immunotherapy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.'TUBERCULOSIS,' writes Sharon Kingman, 'had almost been eradicated by the widespread use of antibiotics and vaccines after the Second World War.' That, like most paeans to the role of drugs in the eradication of infectious illnesses, is simply incorrect.
The best-known study, that of Thomas McKeown, is quite explicit: 'a large part of the decline (in mortality from tuberculosis) occurred before the introduction of effective treatment in 1947.'
As with cholera, typhoid, diphtheria, whooping cough, measles and other infectious diseases, improvements in sanitation, housing and nutrition, coupled with control over disease vectors had virtually eliminated TB before vaccination or antibiotics were introduced. That leaves me wondering why medical science does not use common sense and look for preventive measures or alternative treatments that will not cause mutations.
Dr Denis MacEoin
Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments