Letter: Shetland disaster: tanker controls, safety at sea, UK fleet's decline
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Having worked for a number of years in the engine rooms of diverse vessels, I find it extremely hard to believe that, as has been claimed, the Braer's fuel was contaminated by water due to ingress of seawater from the engine room ventilation system.
The engine room department would have had ample time to jury-rig a temporary clean fuel supply and keep at least one main engine running on slow ahead. All main engine and auxiliaries fuel is fed to day tanks which must be drained of water at least once an hour - these tanks must hold enough fuel for at least 24 hours. There is no way seawater could directly enter any of these tanks.
Yours faithfully,
HUGH BRISTOW
Emsworth, Hampshire
5 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments