Letter: Shephard's pension changes mean mass exodus of teachers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Gillian Shephard argues that it is her duty to ensure that teachers enjoying good health and secure employment should continue in service until they are 60.
However, the Government's proposals would also deny a pension to teachers over 50 who are made compulsorily redundant. These days this is an increasingly likely and frightening prospect for many, since all further education colleges and many schools are independent institutions without the support and resources of a local education authority. Thirty years or so of hard labour in the classroom would then in all likelihood be followed by unemployment and impoverishment.
If she wishes to avoid leaving a legacy of fear and bitterness in the profession, Mrs Shephard needs urgently to re-examine her proposals to eliminate such injustice.
STEVEN TURNBULL
Torquay, Devon
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments