Letter: Shelter can still be indignant
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was pleased by Andreas Whittam Smith's recognition (article, 2 September) of Shelter's path-breaking role as a campaigning charity in the 1960s, and that the need for Shelter is still as great to tackle the different housing problems of the 1990s.
However, I believe his arguments on the danger of government funding are too cynical and pessimistic. We welcome statutory funding wherever this is consistent with our aims and values. This money - inevitably and properly - comes with conditions that it must only be used for the activities defined in the contract. Yet this does not limit our freedom to use money given by our donors to campaign against government policies which we believe are wrong.
Last week Shelter took the Department of the Environment to the High Court over the withdrawal of housing for asylum seekers. We have campaigned to prevent changes to the homelessness laws which we believe to be damaging. We have strongly and publicly opposed cuts in investment in affordable housing and the withdrawal of benefit payments for both home owners and tenants.
Our experience is that government ministers and civil servants understand that we will not compromise our beliefs - and do not try to use statutory contracts as a lever to control what we say.
CHRIS HOLMES
Director
Shelter
London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments